Daley and his group found that treating cells with chromatin-modifying drugs can help wipe clean marks from cells' previous iteration. The hurdle to creating more flexible, embryonic-like stem cells from adult cells, however, might not be insurmountable. "Even rigorously selected iPSCs can retain epigenetic marks characteristic of the donor cell that influence differentiation propensity," Daley and his colleagues wrote in their paper in Nature. In particular, having an iPS cell that retains epigenetic marks of a certain type of tissue might help in coaxing that cell back into that breed, for instance using blood iPS cells to make blood cells for a patient. This cellular memory could affect the way some studies are conducted and interpreted, the researchers noted. The group found that the differences among the various iPS cells mirrored differences among the tissues from which they came. In another study, published online July 19 in Nature Biotechnology, a team of researchers examined different patterns of gene expression in iPS cells from skin, muscle and two varieties of immune progenitor cells in mice. These differences can elucidate some of the results that have perplexed some stem cell researchers. "This paper opens our eyes to the restricted lineage of iPS cells," he said, calling the restriction "both a blessing and a curse." "The residual epigenetic marks in the iPS cells helped to explain the lineage restriction," Andrew Feinberg, director of the Center for Epigenetics at Johns Hopkins University and coauthor of the Nature paper, said in a prepared statement. This so-called memory comes in the form of epigenetic signs that alter the way genes are expressed in the cell. "IPS cells made from blood are easier to turn back into blood than, say, iPS cells made from skin cells or brain cells." This research showed that regular "iPS cells retain a 'memory' of their tissue of origin," Daley explained. But the resulting cells are "on average, closer to bona fide embryonic stem cells than are iPS cells," George Daley, director of the Stem Cell Transplantation at Children's Hospital Boston and coauthor of the study, said in a prepared statement. ![]() The process of nuclear transfer is more cumbersome than standard iPS cell processing. These SCNT cells behaved much more like the flexible embryonic stem cells, the researchers reported in a paper published online July 19 in Nature ( Scientific American is part of Nature Publishing Group). One of the studies found that iPS cells taken from adult mice kept much more of their original genetic information than cells reprogrammed via somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT, in which an adult cell's nucleus is put into an unfertilized egg cell). This process has aimed to make the cells as flexible as embryonic stem cells-which have the capability of becoming any type of specialized body cell-but the new findings throw its effectiveness into question. Two new studies describe the extent to which iPS cells retain genetic markers from their past lives as skin, blood or other types of progenitor cells via the reprogramming process. Curious differences in gene expression between reprogrammed adult stem cells, called induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS cells), and the embryonic stem cells that the former are designed to mimic might now be explained by a new discovery about just how much information a "reprogrammed" adult stem cell retains.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |